ApacheConNA: Hadoop metrics
Posted: | More posts about sizing ApacheConNA ApacheCon Apache Con Hadoop
Have you ever measured the general behaviour of your Hadoop jobs? Have you
sized your cluster accordingly? Do you know whether your work load really is IO
bound or CPU bound? Legend has it noone expecpt Allen Wittenauer over at
Linked.In, formerly Y! ever did this analysis for his clusters.
Steve Watt gave a pitch for actually going out into your datacenter measuring
what is going on there and adjusting the deployment accordingly: In small
clusters it may make sense to rely on raided disks instead of additional
storage nodes to guarantee ``replication levels''. When going out to vendors to
buy hardware don't rely on paper calculations only: Standard servers in Hadoop
clusters are 1 or 2u. This is quite unlike beefy boxes being sold otherwise.
Figure out what reference architecture is being used by partners, run your
standard workloads, adjust the configuration. If you want to run the 10TB
Terrasort to benchmark your hardware and system configuration. Make sure to
capture data during all your runs - have Ganglia or SAR, watch out for
intersting behaviour in io rates, cpu utilisation, network traffic. The goal is
to get the cpu busy, not wait for network or disk.
After the instrumentation and trial run look for over- and underprovisionings,
adjust, leather, rinse, repeat.
Also make sure to talk to the datacenter people: There are floor space, power
and cooling constraints to keep in mind. Don't let the whole datacenter go down
because your cpu intensive job is drawing more power than the DC was designed
for. Ther are also power constraints per floor tile due to cooling issues -
those should dictate the design.
Take a close look at the disks you deploy: SATA vs. SAS can make a 40%
performance difference at a 20% cost difference. Also the number of cores per
machines dictates the number of disks to spread the likelyhood of random read
access. As a rule of thumb - in a 2U machine today there should be at least
twelve large form factor disks.
When it comes to controllers he goal should be to get a dedicated lane to disc,
safe one controller if price is an issue. Trade off compute power against power
Designing your network keep in mind that one switch going down means that one
rack will be gone. This may be a non-issue in a Y! size cluster, in your
smaller scale world it might be worth the money investing in a second switch
though: Having 20 nodes go black isn't a lot of fun if you cannot farm out the
work and re-replication to other nodes and racks. Also make sure to have enough
ports in rack switches for the machines you are planning to provision.
Avoid playing the ops whake-a-mole game by having one large cluster in the
organisation than many different ones where possible. Multi-tenancy in Hadoop is
still pre-mature though.
If you want to play with future deployments - watch out for HP currently
packing 270 servers where today are just two via system on a chip designs.